ACUPCC Reporting System

2008 GHG Report for Berea College

Submitted on March 6, 2009; last updated on May 18, 2009

Summary Statistics

Making fair comparisons between higher education institutions is always challenging due to the rich diversity of higher education. The unverified nature of the information in this database and unavailability of unbiased normalization metrics means such comparisons are even more difficult. Users should therefore approach direct institution to institution comparisons with caution and recognize that all comparisons between institutions are inherently biased.
Total Per Full-Time Enrollment Per 1000 Square Feet % Offset
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2) 19,532 metric tons of CO2e 12.6 metric tons of CO2e 13.9 metric tons of CO2e 139.3%
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2 + 3) 24,830 metric tons of CO2e 16 metric tons of CO2e 17.7 metric tons of CO2e 109.6%
Net emissions -2,374 metric tons of CO2e -1.5 metric tons of CO2e -1.7 metric tons of CO2e N/A

Emissions Inventory Methodology and Boundaries

Start date of the 12-month period covered in this report July 1, 2007
Consolidation methodology used to determine organizational boundaries Operational control approach
If any institution-owned, leased, or operated buildings or other holdings that should fall within the organizational boundaries are omitted, briefly explain why.

College-owned rental homes beyond the campus proper are not included as they are private residences and do not represent the operational resposibility of Berea College.

Emissions calculation tool used Clean Air-Cool Planet
Please describe why this tool was selected.

CA-CP is the recommended tool for ACUPCC implementation. We also participated in an online webinar and regional climate summit to learn how to use this tool.

Please describe the source(s) of the emissions coefficients used.

CA-CP Campus Carbon Calculator's default emissions coefficients for eGRID subregions (Kentucky falls under SRTV subregion and SERC Tennessee Valley region post-2006)

Which version of IPCC's list of global warming potentials did you use? Third Assessment Report
Who primarily conducted this emissions inventory? Sustainability office staff
Please describe the process of conducting the inventory.

President Larry Shinn made a formal campus-wide announcement designating Tammy Clemons, Sustainability Coordinator, and Diane Zekind, Berea's Energy Manager, to serve as the leadership team for coordinating the necessary data collection and implementing the GHG inventory. The announcement alerted the campus community that the process would require the participation of various departments and programs and that the leadership team would immediately be contacting people to discuss the specific information to be gathered and their respective roles in providing accurate and timely responses to requests. The President closed his announcement by providing a summary and follow-up links to the ACUPCC as well as Berea's online 2-month report.

The leadership team participated in a Cool Air-Clean Planet (CA-CP) webinar as well as a regional NWF Campus Ecology climate summit of ACUPCC signatories at Warren Wilson College to learn more about the process and how to use the recommended CA-CP carbon calculator. As Berea's ACUPCC Implementation Liaison, Tammy also participated in a networking meeting with other liaisons at the AASHE conference. Diane and Tammy outlined the different categories of emissions and the likely departments/programs that would be able to supply the necessary data. Then they met with the President, Provost, and Vice President for Business and Administration to plan next steps for implementation of the GHG inventory, such as the President, Vice Presidents, and Dean writing letters or otherwise contacting the relevant individuals/departments under their purview to prepare for subsequent requests from the leadership team.

The organizational boundary was primarily limited to the campus proper with the addition of the College-owned Square adjacent to campus as well as protected forest holdings bordering the town and county. Due to the limited timeframe of the GHG inventory extension, fiscal year 2007-08 was selected as the baseline for data collection. About half of the required information for the GHG inventory was directly available to Diane as an employee within the Facilities Management department on campus. This included physical benchmark data, utilities, refrigerants, some fleet vehicles, and solid waste. Tammy coordinated the communication and collaboration with all additional campus departments/programs to collect other types of information, such as population data, agricultural data, employee data, travel reports, study abroad, paper usage, and mitigation data such as forest and compost sequestration. Through a series of email correspondence with these departments and a couple of one-on-one meetings as necessary, the leadership team helped identify the correct sources of information and clarify the type and scope of the request. Student employees in both the Sustainability Coordinator's office and Energy Manager's office assisted with data collection as possible.

Campus collaborators participated willingly and as expeditiously as possible in the process of data collection and interpretation. While some information was relatively simple to gather, other types of documentation clearly can be improved and refined not only to provide more accurate and organized information for future inventories, but also to better serve the College's overall mission and operations. The leadership team will follow-up on the GHG inventory by meeting again with the President and other key administrators to address some of the challenges of the process and by compiling and summarizing both the inventory and some of the raw data in a report to the campus community.

Please describe any emissions sources that were classified as de minimis and explain how a determination of the significance of these emissions was made.

None

Please describe any data limitations related to this submission and any major assumptions made in response to these limitations.

A couple of campus programs own and operate vehicles independently of the campus Motor Pool fleet. The usage data for these vehicles (less than 10) is therefore not included in this year's report. These departments/programs will be identified for inclusion in the future.

Emissions Data

Emissions from the following sources (in metric tons of CO2e)

Scope 1 Emissions
Stationary Combustion 4,960 metric tons of CO2e
Mobile Combustion 305 metric tons of CO2e
Process Emissions 0 metric tons of CO2e
Fugitive Emissions 589 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 1 emissions 5,854 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 Emissions
Purchased Electricity 13,678 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Heating 0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Cooling 0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Steam 0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 2 emissions 13,678 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 3 Emissions
Commuting 960 metric tons of CO2e
Air Travel 2,440 metric tons of CO2e
Solid Waste 438 metric tons of CO2e
Other Directly Financed Travel (i.e., rental cars, reimbursed mileage, etc.) 107 metric tons of CO2e
Uncoated Freesheet Paper 0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 T&D Losses 1,353 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 3 emissions 5,298 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions
Biogenic Emissions from Stationary Combustion 0 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions from Mobile Combustion 0 metric tons of CO2e

Mitigation Data

Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets purchased 0 metric tons of CO2e
Offset verification program(s) No information provided.
Description of offsets purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

N/A

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Total RECs purchased 0 kWh
Percent of total electricity consumption mitigated through the purchase of RECs 0%
Emissions reductions due to the purchase of RECs 0 metric tons of CO2e
REC verification program(s) No information provided.
Description of RECs purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

N/A

Sequestration and Carbon Storage
Sequestration due to land owned by the institution 27,192 metric tons of CO2e
Description of how sequestration was calculated

Berea College Forester John Perry worked in collaboration with Scott Shouse of the MACED Forest Opportunities Initiative (http://www.maced.org/foi/about.htm) to calculate the College's MTeCO2 offset for its 8000+ acre forest holdings. They used the 3.3 tons/acre/year estimate for Kentucky listed in the Chicago Climate Exchange (www.chicagoclimatex.com). Thus, the total offset of -27192 CO2e was calculated from the sum of the following:

Newly reforested*: 70 acres x 3.3 = 231 tons/acre/year

Existing*: 8,170 acres x 3.3 = 26,961 tons/acre/year

Compost sequestration was calculated in the CA-CP calculator based on total compost weight from the College Farm and Ecovillage.

Carbon storage due to composting 12 metric tons of CO2e

Normalization and Contextual Data

Building Space
Gross square feet of building space 1,405,967 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of laboratory space 25,000 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of health care space 1,836 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of residential space 400,357 sq ft
Population
Total Student Enrollment (FTE) 1,549
Residential Students 1,496
Full-time Commuter Students No information provided.
Part-time Commuter Students No information provided.
Non-Credit Students No information provided.
Full-time Faculty 154
Part-time Faculty No information provided.
Full-time Staff 332
Part-time Staff No information provided.
Other Contextual Data
Endowment Size $1,023,254,700
Heating Degree Days 3,951
Cooling Degree Days 2,112
Please describe any circumstances specific to your institution that provide context for understanding your greenhouse gas emissions this year.

No information provided.

Supporting Documentation

Completed inventory narrative No information provided.
Completed inventory calculator No information provided.

Auditing and Verification

These emissions data have been audited, verified, or peer-reviewed.
Please briefly describe this verification, if any.

While the entire GHG inventory (process and compiled results) was not audited, specific pieces were reviewed by multiple individuals or departments. For example, some components of the inventory were provided, confirmed, and/or reviewed by third-party suppliers (i.e., utilities, solid waste totals, refrigerants, fleet fuel). Some components were reviewed in-house by campus colleagues with relevant expertise (i.e., paper purchases, compost, benchmark data).