ACUPCC Reporting System

2008 GHG Report for James Madison University

Submitted on September 15, 2009; last updated on September 16, 2009

Summary Statistics

Making fair comparisons between higher education institutions is always challenging due to the rich diversity of higher education. The unverified nature of the information in this database and unavailability of unbiased normalization metrics means such comparisons are even more difficult. Users should therefore approach direct institution to institution comparisons with caution and recognize that all comparisons between institutions are inherently biased.
Total Per Full-Time Enrollment Per 1000 Square Feet % Offset
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2) 67,339 metric tons of CO2e 3.9 metric tons of CO2e 13.4 metric tons of CO2e 0.2%
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2 + 3) 85,971 metric tons of CO2e 5 metric tons of CO2e 17.1 metric tons of CO2e 0.2%
Net emissions 85,835 metric tons of CO2e 5 metric tons of CO2e 17 metric tons of CO2e N/A

Emissions Inventory Methodology and Boundaries

Start date of the 12-month period covered in this report July 1, 2007
Consolidation methodology used to determine organizational boundaries Operational control approach
If any institution-owned, leased, or operated buildings or other holdings that should fall within the organizational boundaries are omitted, briefly explain why.

All buildings under the operational control of JMU are included.

Emissions calculation tool used Clean Air-Cool Planet
Please describe why this tool was selected.

The CACP Campus Carbon Calculator is recommended in the ACUPCC Implementation Guide and is consistent with the international consensus greenhouse gas accounting protocols developed by the World Resources Institute/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD).

Please describe the source(s) of the emissions coefficients used.

CACP Campus Carbon Calculator (V. 6.0).

Which version of IPCC's list of global warming potentials did you use? Third Assessment Report
Who primarily conducted this emissions inventory? External consultant
Please describe the process of conducting the inventory.

The inventory was developed through a series of steps including: a) establishing inventory protocols, boundaries, and definitions b) identifying emissions sources through an activity description questionnaire c) collecting data on emissions sources using a data collection scorecard d) estimating emissions using the CACP Campus Carbon Calculator e) reporting emissions and receiving feedback from steering committee on report.

Please describe any emissions sources that were classified as de minimis and explain how a determination of the significance of these emissions was made.

The following emission sources were classified as de minimis:
• Scope 1: Process Emissions; Fugitive Emissions.
• Scope 3: Air Travel; Solid Waste.
A generally accepted criterion for selection of de minimis sources is that they should constitute <5% of gross emissions combined (in metric tons of CO2 equivalent). By comparison, for FY 2007-2008 the sources listed above constitute 3.9% of gross emissions combined.

Please describe any data limitations related to this submission and any major assumptions made in response to these limitations.

Estimates of non-bus commuting behaviors were obtained from the working draft (01/16/2008) of the JMU Sustainable Mobility Paper. Air travel mileage was estimated from partial data available for FY2006 and scaled for population.

Emissions Data

Emissions from the following sources (in metric tons of CO2e)

Scope 1 Emissions
Stationary Combustion 5,420 metric tons of CO2e
Mobile Combustion 1,322 metric tons of CO2e
Process Emissions 1 metric tons of CO2e
Fugitive Emissions 220 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 1 emissions 6,963 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 Emissions
Purchased Electricity 44,235 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Heating 0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Cooling 3,796 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Steam 12,345 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 2 emissions 60,376 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 3 Emissions
Commuting 10,256 metric tons of CO2e
Air Travel 1,797 metric tons of CO2e
Solid Waste 1,355 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Electricity Transmission & Distribution Losses 5,224 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 3 emissions 18,632 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions
Biogenic Emissions from Stationary Combustion No information provided.
Biogenic Emissions from Mobile Combustion No information provided.

Mitigation Data

Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets purchased No information provided.
Offset verification program(s) No information provided.
Description of offsets purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

No information provided.

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Total RECs purchased No information provided.
Percent of total electricity consumption mitigated through the purchase of RECs No information provided.
Emissions reductions due to the purchase of RECs No information provided.
REC verification program(s) No information provided.
Description of RECs purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

No information provided.

Sequestration and Carbon Storage
Sequestration due to land owned by the institution 136 metric tons of CO2e
Description of how sequestration was calculated

JMU has two major forested properties: the Edith J. Carrier Arboretum, and the Madison College Farm, with a total forested acreage of approximately 111 acres. For calculation purposes, it was assumed that the percent canopy cover in these two areas was 100%. The sequestration rate (0.335 tons C/acre) is given by Rowntree (Rowntree, 1991) and accounts for tree age (represented by diameter), since the rate that a forest sequesters carbon is dependent on the age of the trees within the forest. It was further assumed that the tree diameter distribution of the forests on these JMU properties could be approximated by the average tree diameter distribution given by Rowntree. Both of these assumptions were considered adequate because of the small scale of the carbon sequestration provided by the forests in relation to JMU’s total GHG emissions.

Carbon storage due to composting No information provided.

Normalization and Contextual Data

Building Space
Gross square feet of building space 5,034,696 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of laboratory space No information provided.
Net assignable square feet of health care space No information provided.
Net assignable square feet of residential space No information provided.
Population
Total Student Enrollment (FTE) 17,339
Residential Students No information provided.
Full-time Commuter Students No information provided.
Part-time Commuter Students No information provided.
Non-Credit Students No information provided.
Full-time Faculty No information provided.
Part-time Faculty No information provided.
Full-time Staff No information provided.
Part-time Staff No information provided.
Other Contextual Data
Endowment Size No information provided.
Heating Degree Days 4,329
Cooling Degree Days 1,082
Please describe any circumstances specific to your institution that provide context for understanding your greenhouse gas emissions this year.

No information provided.

Supporting Documentation

Completed inventory narrative Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory Program: An Integrated Evaluation of Energy and Resource Usage
Download (JMU FY2005-08 GHG Inventory Program.PDF)
Completed inventory calculator Download (JMU FY2005-08 GHG Inventory Calculator.xls)

Auditing and Verification

These emissions data have not been audited, verified, or peer-reviewed.